Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -TradeSphere
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:38:18
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (1916)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- 4 dead after small plane crashes near South Carolina golf course
- U.S. Wind Power Is ‘Going All Out’ with Bigger Tech, Falling Prices, Reports Show
- Shannen Doherty Shares Her Cancer Has Spread to Her Brain
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- How Georgia Became a Top 10 Solar State, With Lawmakers Barely Lifting a Finger
- How Georgia Became a Top 10 Solar State, With Lawmakers Barely Lifting a Finger
- This week on Sunday Morning (July 2)
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- 5 Ways Trump’s Clean Power Rollback Strips Away Health, Climate Protections
Ranking
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Vanderpump Rules' Lala Kent’s Affordable Amazon Haul is So Chic You’d Never “Send it to Darrell
- Key Question as Exxon Climate Trial Begins: What Did Investors Believe?
- Stormi Webster Is All Grown Up as Kylie Jenner Celebrates Daughter’s Pre-Kindergarten Graduation
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Warming Trends: Battling Beetles, Climate Change Blues and a Tool That Helps You Take Action
- Mom influencer Katie Sorensen sentenced to jail for falsely claiming couple tried to kidnap her kids at a crafts store
- Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Eviscerated for Low Blow About Sex Life With Ariana Madix
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Why Khloe Kardashian Doesn’t Feel “Complete Bond” With Son Tatum Thompson
Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Eviscerated for Low Blow About Sex Life With Ariana Madix
Louisville’s Super-Polluting Chemical Plant Emits Not One, But Two Potent Greenhouse Gases
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Coal Giant Murray Energy Files for Bankruptcy Despite Trump’s Support
The Trump Administration Moves to Open Alaska’s Tongass National Forest to Logging
Nobel-Winning Economist to Testify in Children’s Climate Lawsuit