Current:Home > ContactNevada judge approves signature-gathering stage for petition to put abortion rights on 2024 ballot -TradeSphere
Nevada judge approves signature-gathering stage for petition to put abortion rights on 2024 ballot
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:01:04
RENO, Nev. (AP) — A Nevada judge has approved a petition by abortion access advocates as eligible for signature gathering in their long-standing attempt to get abortion rights on the 2024 ballot.
Carson City District Judge James T. Russell made the ruling Tuesday, about two months after he struck down a similar yet broader version that, if passed, would have enshrined additional reproductive rights into the state’s constitution.
If the Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom political action committee gets enough signatures, a question would appear on the November ballot that would enshrine abortion access into the Nevada constitution for up to 24 weeks, or as needed to protect the health of the pregnant patient. Then, voters would need to pass again on the 2026 ballot to amend the constitution.
Abortion rights up to 24 weeks are already codified into Nevada law through a 1990 referendum vote, where two-thirds of voters were in favor. That can be changed with another referendum vote.
The standards are higher for amending the constitution, which requires either approval from two legislative sessions and an election, or two consecutive elections with a simple majority of votes.
The petition that was cleared for signatures is one of two efforts from the Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom committee to get the right to abortion on the 2024 ballot.
Russell rejected an earlier petition in a November ruling, saying the proposed ballot initiative was too broad, contained a “misleading description of effect” and had an unfunded mandate.
The petition would have included protections for “matters relating to their pregnancies” including prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, birth control, vasectomies, tubal ligations, abortion and abortion care as well as care for miscarriages and infertility. Nevadans for Reproductive Freedoms appealed that rejection to the Nevada Supreme Court and are waiting for a new ruling.
The petition approved for signatures Tuesday had narrower language — “establishing a fundamental, individual right to abortion,” which applies to “decisions about matters relating to abortion” without government interference.
In a statement following the ruling, Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom spokesperson Lindsey Hamon celebrated the ruling but said she remained confident that the committee’s initial petition will be recognized as eligible by the Nevada Supreme Court.
“Abortion rights are not the only form of reproductive freedom under attack across the country,” Hamon said. “Protecting miscarriage management, birth control, prenatal and postpartum care, and other vital reproductive health care services are inextricably linked pieces of a singular right to reproductive freedom.”
Abortion rights have become a mobilizing issue for Democrats since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 court decision establishing a nationwide right to abortion.
Constitutional amendments protecting abortion access are already set to appear on the 2024 ballot in New York and Maryland and could also show up in a host of states, including Missouri and neighboring Arizona.
Lawmakers in Nevada’s Democratic-controlled Legislature are also attempting to get reproductive rights including abortion access in front of voters on the 2026 ballot. The initiative, which would enshrine those rights in the state constitution, passed the state Senate and Assembly in May 2023 and now must be approved with a simple majority again in 2025 before being eligible for the 2026 ballot.
___
Stern is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms. Follow Stern on X, formerly Twitter: @gabestern326.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Authorities were warned that gunman was planning to attack Yellowstone facility
- Pro-Palestinian protestor wearing keffiyeh charged with violating New York county’s face mask ban
- Elle King Addresses Relationship With Dad Rob Schneider Amid Viral Feud
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Anti-'woke' activists waged war on DEI. Civil rights groups are fighting back.
- Not Just a Teen Mom: Inside Jamie Lynn Spears' Impressively Normal Private World Since Leaving Hollywood Behind
- Why JoJo Felt Insecure About Her Body While Filming Aquamarine
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Apple releases iOS 18 update for iPhone: Customizations, Messages, other top changes
Ranking
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Meet Travis Hunter: cornerback, receiver, anthropology nerd and lover of cheesy chicken
- What is Cover 2 defense? Two-high coverages in the NFL, explained
- Georgia jobless rate rises for a fourth month in August
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Board approves more non-lethal weapons for UCLA police after Israel-Hamas war protests
- Josh Heupel's rise at Tennessee born out of Oklahoma firing that was blessing in disguise
- Why Cheryl Burke Has Remained Celibate for 3 Years Since Matthew Lawrence Divorce
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
NFL Week 3 picks straight up and against spread: Will Ravens beat Cowboys for first win?
Japan celebrates as Ohtani becomes the first major leaguer to reach 50-50 milestone
Who is Arch Manning? Texas names QB1 for Week 4 as Ewers recovers from injury
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Whoa! 'Golden Bachelorette' first impression fails, including that runaway horse
Trial of man who killed 10 at Colorado supermarket turns to closing arguments
Florida sheriff shames 2 more kids after school threats. Is it a good idea?