Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -TradeSphere
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:45:45
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (85379)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Here's how to free up space on your iPhone: Watch video tutorial
- Trial for 3 former Memphis officers charged in Tyre Nichols’ death set to begin
- How We Live in Time Helped Andrew Garfield's Healing Journey After His Mom's Death
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Stellantis recalls over 1.2M Ram 1500 pickup trucks in the US
- Selena Gomez Says She Can't Carry Her Own Children Amid Health Journey
- I'm a retired Kansas grocer. Big-box dollar stores moved into town and killed my business.
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Kathy Bates Announces Plans to Retire After Acting for More Than 50 Years
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- US seeks new pedestrian safety rules aimed at increasingly massive SUVs and pickup trucks
- Powerball winning numbers for September 7: Jackpot climbs to $112 million
- Lauren Sánchez reveals how fiance Jeff Bezos and her kids inspired her children's book
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Trader Joe's viral mini tote bags returning soon
- Norfolk Southern railroad says its CEO is under investigation for alleged ethical lapses
- Anna Nicole Smith’s Daughter Dannielynn Gets Gothic Makeover for Her 18th Birthday
Recommendation
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Battery-powered devices are overheating more often on planes and raising alarm
Big Cities Disrupt the Atmosphere, Often Generating More Rainfall, But Can Also Have a Drying Effect
Tyreek Hill was not ‘immediately cooperative’ with officers during stop, police union says
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
Justin Fields hasn't sparked a Steelers QB controversy just yet – but stay tuned
Big Cities Disrupt the Atmosphere, Often Generating More Rainfall, But Can Also Have a Drying Effect
AP PHOTOS: Church services help Georgia residents mourn victims of school shootings