Current:Home > MyChicago-area police entered wrong home, held disabled woman and grandkids for hours, lawsuit alleges -TradeSphere
Chicago-area police entered wrong home, held disabled woman and grandkids for hours, lawsuit alleges
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 06:15:41
Chicago-area police serving an arrest warrant entered the wrong home in 2021 and held a disabled woman, her four young grandchildren and others for hours, violating their civil rights, a federal lawsuit alleges.
Adela Carrasco, 63, her grandchildren and other plaintiffs contend in a lawsuit filed Wednesday that officers went to wrong address and demanded entry, even after Carrasco told them the person they were seeking didn’t live at her residence in a multi-unit home in Joliet, about 50 miles (80 kilometers) southwest of Chicago.
The suit alleges that after Carrasco opened the door, officers pointed loaded firearms directly at her and her grandchildren, who were ages 10, 12, 13 and 14 at the time, and detained them, relatives and others for six hours without legal cause on Nov. 2, 2021.
Police also allegedly refused requests by Carrasco, who has COPD and asthma and walks with a cane, to get her asthma inhaler and use the bathroom.
“This is unacceptable behavior towards young children and an elderly, disabled woman, regardless of the circumstances,” Zach Hofeld, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, said in a statement. “There is a modicum of decency and reasonableness with which police must treat the elderly and children.”
Although officers did not have a search warrant, while they were inside Carrasco’s residence they allegedly cut open couch cushions, flipped mattresses and pulled clothing from drawers.
The complaint contends police violated the plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment right protecting individuals from improper search and seizures as well as their due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
It seeks unspecified damages for “egregious violations” of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, emotional distress, psychological pain and the suffering.
When officers arrived at Carrasco’s residence, the suit alleges they knew they were at the wrong address and were using the arrest warrant for a then-18-year-old man who lived in the unit adjacent to Carrasco’s “as a false pretext” to search her residence.
Officers also shouted a surname different from the last name listed on the warrant for the young man, who was wanted in connection with weapons-related offenses, it contends.
The plaintiffs were all living at the time in the adjacent units within the same home and all were relatives, with the exception of two girlfriends, their attorneys said.
The two residential units were clearly marked with different addresses. But the suit alleges that a Joliet police detective acted “on a hunch” and wondered if the suspect’s older brother, who lived at Carrasco’s residence, could be connected to a Halloween party shooting days earlier that killed two people.
At the time, the “defendants faced enormous, mounting, public pressure to make an arrest” in that deadly shooting, the suit says.
Officers eventually entered the adjacent residence and arrested the 18-year-old. But despite his arrest officers detained Carrasco, her grandchildren and the others for hours, it alleges
Police later arrested and charged three people in the Halloween shooting, and none of those suspects had “any relation” to the 18-year-old or anyone who lived at either of the two units, the suit says.
It names as defendants the city of Joliet, more than a dozen current or former Joliet officers, Will County and several officers with the county sheriff’s department. The U.S. Marshals Service is also a defendant because two current or former members of the federal agency were also involved in serving the warrant, the complaint alleges.
The city of Joliet does not comment on pending litigation, said Christopher Regis, deputy corporation counsel for the city.
Messages seeking comment on the lawsuit were left Friday with the Will County State’s Attorney’s Office and the U.S. Marshals Service.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed